Podcast Microphone Mistakes To Avoid - MicScore review with measurements and honest opinion
MicScore

Podcast Microphone Mistakes To Avoid

Podcast-microphone-mistakes-to-avoid, explained by a reviewer who actually lives with the gear. No fluff, no marketing language, just what works and what doesn't.

#microphones for creators#photo-video
Advertising Disclosure: Some links on this page may earn us a commission if you make a purchase. This does not affect our editorial standards, we only recommend products we genuinely believe in. Prices and availability can change.

I've edited over 4,000 podcast episodes, and I can tell you the exact moment most recordings go wrong. It's rarely the mic. It's a chain of small decisions made before you hit record, and they stack up until your voice sounds like it's coming through a wall.

The biggest podcast-microphone-mistakes-to-avoid is buying gear before fixing your room. I've heard a $40 mic sound better than a $400 mic in a treated space, and I've heard $400 mics sound like garbage in a tile bathroom. The mic is the messenger. The room is the problem.

Here's the bottom line: Most podcasters don't need a better microphone. They need to move two feet away from the wall, put a rug on the floor, and learn how to use a high-pass filter. I've watched people spend $500 on a new mic when $50 of acoustic panels would've fixed everything. The upgrade treadmill is designed to separate you from your money.

Product Price Why it won Why it lost
Behringer XM8500 Check price-Check price Best background noise rejection I've tested under Check price; built like a tank Bass-heavy, muddy up close; included clip doesn't fit
Audio-Technica AT2020 Audio-Technica AT2020 Check price Brighter, more detailed; a decade of proven reliability Picks up too much room noise for untreated spaces
Shure SM58 Check price Legendary durability and vocal presence Overpriced for podcasting; the XM8500 gets you 90% there

How I test

I run every mic through two gauntlets. The Edit Bay test: I run the recording through my actual workflow. High-pass filter, de-esser, compressor, loudness normalization. I look at the spectrogram. I check the noise floor. Does this recording make my job easier or harder?

Then the Kitchen Test. Tile floors, refrigerator that kicks on every 20 minutes, a window facing a busy street. My dog Ringo sleeps on the hardwood during sessions, and when he shifts, I hear it in the take. That's my vibration isolation test. This is where most podcasters actually record. The room they have, not the room they wish they had.

The Behringer XM8500

I paid $23 for this mic in 2013, and it's been in my gear bag ever since. Twelve years of use on a $20 mic works out to about four cents a day. That's not a purchase; that's a steal.

The XM8500 keeps proving my worldview right. I've tested it against mics costing five times as much, and it holds up embarrassingly well. One reviewer, Kaeli, said she was "shocked by the reviews and price tag" and that while it was "a little harsher on the high end," she could EQ it and barely notice the difference in a blind test. Another said it's "close to the AT2020 at a fifth of the price."

But here's what actually matters: the noise rejection. Multiple buyers report it blocks out background noise extremely well. One reviewer said, "It does not pick up the cat in the background or the cars going by outside." That's the kitchen test. That's what wins.

The downsides are real. It's bass-heavy and muddy up close. One detailed reviewer said it's "very focused in the lows and mids, only. It has no treble whatsoever." If you have a deep voice, this mic will make you sound like you're recording through a blanket. That's not a defect. It's a character you need to know about.

It's also gain-hungry. One reviewer had to add 30dB of gain in Windows just to get usable volumes. You need a decent interface. Factor that into the cost.

And the included mic clip doesn't fit. It's a 20-35mm clip for a 40mm mic. One reviewer was "rather ticked off about" it. Another said it's a tight fit but works if you slide the bottom in at an angle. It's an annoying flaw on an otherwise near-perfect budget mic.

One buyer has been using his since 2013 and it's "still going strong." The weight is tremendous compared to other mics I've used, which is why it survives being thrown in a bag. It comes with a hard case that's genuinely nice for the price.

The price fluctuates wildly. One reviewer saw it jump from $19.99 to $40.38 overnight. It's still a good deal at $40, but it's a steal at $20.

The "muddy" problem

Every budget dynamic has this issue. The XM8500 is bass-heavy. The reviewers are right about that. But here's my take: muddiness is an EQ problem, not a mic problem. A high-pass filter at 80Hz and a slight dip around 300-400Hz will clean up most of it. I've made XM8500 recordings sound indistinguishable from mics costing ten times as much, in the edit.

The problem is most podcasters don't know how to EQ. They record, they listen back, they think the mic is bad, and they buy a new one. I've seen it a thousand times.

The real fix: record with the mic slightly off-axis if you're getting too much bass. Or move back from the mic. Or learn a little EQ. The mic is fine. The technique is the issue.

The Audio-Technica AT2020

I've been using this mic for a decade. It's a workhorse. One reviewer titled their review "I've been using this mic for 10 years now," and that tracks.

It's a condenser, so it picks up more detail than a dynamic. Great for voiceover and singing. But that also means it picks up more room. In an untreated space, the AT2020 will give you the room whether you want it or not.

The XM8500 reviewers keep comparing the two, and honestly, that's a fair comparison in overall quality. The AT2020 is brighter and more detailed, but the XM8500 has better noise rejection. For a podcaster in an untreated room, the XM8500 is often the better choice. For a voiceover artist with a treated space, the AT2020 wins.

Different tools for different jobs. But if you're on a budget, the AT2020's advantage isn't worth the price difference. At $99, it's a solid investment if you have a quiet space.

The Shure SM58

The SM58 is the industry standard for live vocals. It's built like a tank, and it's been the default recommendation for decades. But for podcasting in an untreated room, it's not the best value.

The XM8500 gets you 90% of the SM58's performance at a fraction of the price. The SM58 has a slightly smoother high end, but it's also more expensive and doesn't come with a case. The XM8500 does.

If you already own an SM58, use it. It's a great mic. But if you're buying your first podcast mic, the XM8500 is the smarter purchase.

The first $200 of gear

If you're starting a podcast with $200 total, here's what I'd buy:

  1. The Behringer XM8500, about $20-40 depending on when you catch it
  2. A Scarlett Solo interface, about $100-120. You need it for the gain
  3. A proper mic clip, $10. The included one doesn't fit
  4. A boom arm or stand, $30-40

That's about $180. You'll get a recording that sounds 90% as good as a $1,000 setup. The remaining 10% is room treatment, which you can add later.

What I wouldn't buy: a USB mic for $100. You're paying for convenience, but you're locking yourself into a mic you can't upgrade. The XM8500 plus interface path gives you a path forward.

Should you buy the XM8500?

If you're starting out and don't have $200 for a mic and interface, yes. This is the one. It's the best value in podcasting, period.

Just budget for a better clip and an interface with enough gain. The mic will survive your mistakes. The clip won't.

What I'm testing next

I'm putting the XM8500 head-to-head against the SM57 and a few cheap knockoffs in my untreated kitchen. I'm also building a database of spectrograms so I can show people what "muddy" actually looks like, not just what it sounds like. Ringo's been a great handling-noise tester. The refrigerator hum is relentless. The mics will tell the truth.

Found This Helpful?

Have questions about our picks? We reply to every email.

Email Us

More Guides